Annex Greenland

J.D Vance and his wife Usha will shortly visit Greenland. Vance's visit sheds light on an important question. Why shouldn't the US manage its increasingly important economic and defense interests with respect to close proximity Greenland in peaceful cooperation with NATO ally Denmark? Because Denmark is a weak, woke, unreliable steward for strategically critical Greenland. Denmark NATO contribution of 1.5% of GDP is well short of the already meager requirement of 2%. Denmark's misguided green energy policy has weakened Denmark economically. Radical secular, anti-family, anti-Christian government policy has vitiated Denmark's cultural fabric. Meanwhile, Denmark has welcomed the immigration flood of culturally energetic Muslim immigrants who are not eager to trade their own, deep seated religious and cultural traditions for the new Danish nihilistic weltanschauung. The melding of traditional Danish cultural decline and growing numbers of Islamic immigrants has given rise to an unstable cultural stand-off in Denmark... all with a backdrop of secular economic decline. With strategically important Greenland in the balance, considering the growing unreliability of Greenland's steward, Denmark, annexation of Greenland, as a Monroe Doctrine variant, should become a priority to safeguard America's national interest.